The entry filled and the call is being tracked candle by candle.
What is the logic behind this SOL short?
Written by the trader before the outcome was known, and never edited since.
📉Short $SOL #117.35, trendline retest, 50 EMA dynamic, RSI divergence. Target: $108, Stop: $120.
Thesis at publication
The longer case, also locked at publication.
Today's SOL retest of trendline confluence at 117.35 holds significance as it aligns with the 50EMA dynamic defense, where prior resistance has now flipped to support. This level also coincides with a hidden RSI divergence, hinting at waning bullish momentum. My short call entry here exploits the setup's confluence, targeting 111.56 based on gapfill and trendline extension. Invalidation occurs at 121.21, mark of recent highs and EMA200, ensuring a disciplined approach to risk management.
Market context
What was true around SOL when this call was published.
There were no other open SOL calls when this was published.
3 graded calls, 100% closed above breakeven, mean +1.58R. Frozen as of the post — it is not recomputed.
Across all 33 graded SOL calls on TradeLiveX from 30 traders, 42% closed above breakeven with a mean of -0.03R.
Discussion
Comments do not affect this call's grade or the trader's performance figures.
Log in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. If you think this call is wrong, this is the place to say why — before the outcome, not after.
Transparent Signal Record & Verification Ledger
TradeLiveX maintains a public, unalterable record of trade predictions across Crypto, Forex, and Stocks. Every call is locked at publish time with immutable entry, stop loss, and take-profit targets. Outcomes are algorithmically checked against independent market feeds with zero retroactive edits or survivorship bias.