Posted by adam_morris · 2026-09-27 15:05:42 UTC
The entry filled and the call is being tracked candle by candle.
What is the logic behind this LINK short?
Written by the trader before the outcome was known, and never edited since.
Short $LINK at 13.992 as it retests key trendline resistance, EMA50 aligns for dynamic sell-off, RSI divergence hints at momentum stall.
Thesis at publication
The longer case, also locked at publication.
13.992 is key today, touching trendline confluence and 50 EMA, with RSI hinting at hidden divergence. Targeting 13.193, a prior FVG, as shorts squeeze cited liq sweeps post retest. SL is 14.525, at next OB to invalidate thesis
Market context
What was true around LINK when this call was published.
Among active calls posted on TradeLiveX at that moment, 40% of 5 open LINK calls from 5 traders were long.
This was among their first calls — no graded record existed yet.
Across all 31 graded LINK calls on TradeLiveX from 28 traders, 39% closed above breakeven with a mean of -0.12R.
Discussion
Comments do not affect this call's grade or the trader's performance figures.
Log in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. If you think this call is wrong, this is the place to say why — before the outcome, not after.
Transparent Signal Record & Verification Ledger
TradeLiveX maintains a public, unalterable record of trade predictions across Crypto, Forex, and Stocks. Every call is locked at publish time with immutable entry, stop loss, and take-profit targets. Outcomes are algorithmically checked against independent market feeds with zero retroactive edits or survivorship bias.