+1.52RB
1
- Entry
- 763.82
- Stop
- 737.22
- TP1
- 804.07
- Conviction
- low
◆ +1,517🔥 6
See the full outcome →s_lewis58
Technical analysis pureist. Heavy reliance on multi-timeframe volume profile, anchored VWAP, and key liquidity sweep levels to find institutional order flow. Patiently waiting for A+ setups to materialize.
On TradeLiveX since 2026-09-15 · 1 call published
Building track record — 1/20
No composite score is shown until there is enough sample to mean anything.
Reputation 10 · 50 followers
✓ Timestamp recorded✓ Outcome checked— Identity verified— Broker-connected
Track record
Plain statistics with their denominators. This comes first, before any composite.
Graded calls
1
Entered and run to a conclusion
Above breakeven
100%
1W / 0L / 0BE
Mean R
+1.52R
Not an account return
Median R
+1.52R
Half above, half below
Profit factor
—
Undefined — no losses yet
Worst call
+1.52R
Cannot be hidden or deleted
Active days
1
Effective sample
1.0
After damping correlated calls
Never entered
0%
0 calls whose level never traded
Cancelled
0%
0 cancelled before entry
Ambiguous
0%
Bars containing both stop and target
Open now
0
Live calls
Modeled outcome. This is a graded prediction, not proof that a trade was executed or that money was made. How grading works
Where the record comes from
Broken down so a single instrument or timeframe cannot carry the headline.
By instrument
| n | Win | Mean R | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BNB | 1 | 100% | +1.52R |
By timeframe
| n | Win | Mean R | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1d | 1 | 100% | +1.52R |
By stated conviction
| n | Win | Mean R | |
|---|---|---|---|
| low | 1 | 100% | +1.52R |
Does high conviction actually perform better? This is where you find out.
Every call
In order, unfiltered. Losses are not collapsed or dimmed.