The entry filled and the call is being tracked candle by candle.
What is the logic behind this DOT short?
Written by the trader before the outcome was known, and never edited since.
Short $DOT 1.213, invalid at 1.225.
Thesis at publication
The longer case, also locked at publication.
-entered short on $DOT at 1.213, key level where Oct 20 low and 34-ema confluence. Volume expansion and RSI(55.0) signal structural shift, bullish impulsive move losing steam. Target 1 at 1.149, where June high and 61.8% Fib retrace align. Stop at 1.256 invalidates thesis, breaks above recent range compression
Market context
What was true around DOT when this call was published.
There were no other open DOT calls when this was published.
1 graded calls, 100% closed above breakeven, mean +0.45R. Frozen as of the post — it is not recomputed.
Across all 48 graded DOT calls on TradeLiveX from 44 traders, 44% closed above breakeven with a mean of -0.15R.
Discussion
Comments do not affect this call's grade or the trader's performance figures.
Log in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. If you think this call is wrong, this is the place to say why — before the outcome, not after.
Transparent Signal Record & Verification Ledger
TradeLiveX maintains a public, unalterable record of trade predictions across Crypto, Forex, and Stocks. Every call is locked at publish time with immutable entry, stop loss, and take-profit targets. Outcomes are algorithmically checked against independent market feeds with zero retroactive edits or survivorship bias.