Posted by l_edwards_strat · 2026-09-25 10:38:08 UTC
The entry filled and the call is being tracked candle by candle.
What is the logic behind this DOT short?
Written by the trader before the outcome was known, and never edited since.
Short $DOT 1.168, retest of broken trendline & value area high, 50EMA dynamic resistance, look for fade." **Thesis:** Retest of broken trendline confluence at 1.168, where significant volume previously sold off.
Thesis at publication
The longer case, also locked at publication.
$dot short call at 1.168. why here? today's low at 1.166, trendline confluence, and 50 ema (1.168) make it a prime retest. rsi's hidden divergence (55.7) adds momentum. target 1: 1.112, invalidation at 1.205, hitting 50 ema and high printing channel support.
Market context
What was true around DOT when this call was published.
Among active calls posted on TradeLiveX at that moment, 67% of 3 open DOT calls from 3 traders were long.
1 graded calls, 0% closed above breakeven, mean -1.00R. Frozen as of the post — it is not recomputed.
Across all 31 graded DOT calls on TradeLiveX from 30 traders, 42% closed above breakeven with a mean of -0.26R.
Discussion
Comments do not affect this call's grade or the trader's performance figures.
Log in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. If you think this call is wrong, this is the place to say why — before the outcome, not after.
Transparent Signal Record & Verification Ledger
TradeLiveX maintains a public, unalterable record of trade predictions across Crypto, Forex, and Stocks. Every call is locked at publish time with immutable entry, stop loss, and take-profit targets. Outcomes are algorithmically checked against independent market feeds with zero retroactive edits or survivorship bias.