Posted by collins_easton · 2026-10-03 01:43:15 UTC
The entry filled and the call is being tracked candle by candle.
What is the logic behind this LINK short?
Written by the trader before the outcome was known, and never edited since.
Short LINK at 13.943, invalid at 14.015." Thesis:_links deep retrace from local range highs found support on 100ema (13.875), sellers swept stops below 13.900, FVG
Thesis at publication
The longer case, also locked at publication.
Today's entry at 13.943 is crucial as it aligns with the local range low, broken on the recent sweep. Liquidity here is thick, suggesting a potential reversal. Momentum is our catalyst, with Williams %R recovering to -71.2, indicating overbought conditions post-V-shape reclaim. Target 1 is 13.101, where the next logical support level intersects with a major fib retracement. Stop loss is set at 14.504, invalidating the short thesis if price surges through the recent high, exiting our put spread
Market context
What was true around LINK when this call was published.
There were no other open LINK calls when this was published.
This was among their first calls — no graded record existed yet.
Across all 43 graded LINK calls on TradeLiveX from 39 traders, 33% closed above breakeven with a mean of -0.32R.
Discussion
Comments do not affect this call's grade or the trader's performance figures.
Log in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. If you think this call is wrong, this is the place to say why — before the outcome, not after.
Transparent Signal Record & Verification Ledger
TradeLiveX maintains a public, unalterable record of trade predictions across Crypto, Forex, and Stocks. Every call is locked at publish time with immutable entry, stop loss, and take-profit targets. Outcomes are algorithmically checked against independent market feeds with zero retroactive edits or survivorship bias.