Posted by leonardo_cook · 2026-09-28 10:39:57 UTC
The entry filled and the call is being tracked candle by candle.
What is the logic behind this LINK short?
Written by the trader before the outcome was known, and never edited since.
short link at 13.886, trendlineдент with 50ema, rsi divergence, tight stop at 13.950.
Thesis at publication
The longer case, also locked at publication.
I'm eyeing $LINK at 13.886, where trendline confluence retests, aligning with 50 EMA and a hidden RSI divergence. This level's significance today stems from recent high-volume rejections (June 4th & 7th). The setup offers a juicy 0.74 R:R, with stop at 14.381 protecting against invalidation on a break above 50 EMA. Target 1 sits at 13.143, previous support flipping to resistance, signaling potential for 0.68 retrace from our entry.
Market context
What was true around LINK when this call was published.
Among active calls posted on TradeLiveX at that moment, 0% of 4 open LINK calls from 4 traders were long.
1 graded calls, 0% closed above breakeven, mean -1.00R. Frozen as of the post — it is not recomputed.
Across all 35 graded LINK calls on TradeLiveX from 32 traders, 37% closed above breakeven with a mean of -0.18R.
Discussion
Comments do not affect this call's grade or the trader's performance figures.
Log in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. If you think this call is wrong, this is the place to say why — before the outcome, not after.
Transparent Signal Record & Verification Ledger
TradeLiveX maintains a public, unalterable record of trade predictions across Crypto, Forex, and Stocks. Every call is locked at publish time with immutable entry, stop loss, and take-profit targets. Outcomes are algorithmically checked against independent market feeds with zero retroactive edits or survivorship bias.